Clipart is used to create a web-design, you can also draw up bills, posters, make cards, collages and wallpapers. Thanks to ClipArt and its individual elements, the new image is created including all the elements; it looks like it’s a photomontage, a creation of new design. At the same time, it will be a big plus if ClipArt goes without a background, since you do not have to waste time removing it. What’s the format of this kind of image? These are wide known PNG and GIF formats; the images can be saved both with a background and without it. There are aslo scrapbook kits for creativity, which consist of png images; those are a set of elements and backgrounds. 

I use clipart often and transport it into other programs such as Print Master to make cards. It was easy to make a few small changes in it and use what you redesigned. I hope you'll reconsider it's removal and put it back. Personally, I don't care for Bing's images. And I don't want to go out on the net to find other clipart when I'm in the process of getting a manuscript together. It's a waste of time.


Español: agregar Clip Art a Microsoft Word, Italiano: Aggiungere Clip Art in Microsoft Word, Русский: вставить клипарт в Word, Português: Inserir Cliparts em um Documento do Microsoft Word, Deutsch: ClipArt zu Microsoft Word hinzufügen, Bahasa Indonesia: Menambahkan ClipArt ke Microsoft Word, Français: insérer des cliparts dans un document Word, Nederlands: Clipart toevoegen aan Microsoft Word, العربية: إدراج صورة كليب آرت في مستند مايكروسوفت وورد
I used clipart a LOT for newsetters and other documents. I don't always want a photo - clipart is often better at getting an idea across quickly, and I didn't need to worry about copyright because I assumed it was OK to use without permission as it was a part of the MS package. The BING option is terrible - very juvenile and hardly extensive with fewer than 50 options. And by-the-way, most of the online sites for "accessing clipart in MS Word 2010" still say to go to insert then click on clipart. Really - we hardly need such basic instructions when they aren't even correct anymore!
As an artist I resent some people's assumption that original art from my abilities and imagination, which I have sacrificed a lot to develop, should somehow default to public property. If we require artists to participate in a money economy their art belongs to them. Copying images and not following the copyright owners permissions to the letter is stealing, outright. And deep pockets like Disney has taught individuals that the hard way.
This is TERRIBLE! Besides being able to edit vector images like Will mentioned (which is important for those of us who don't have graphic artists available to create custom images or the budget or time to buy that service ad hoc), you could also search for style "families" (different graphics that were all in the same style). There was a huge range of files and styles in the collection and it was much faster to find what you need than to do a Bing search. Plus, you knew that everything there was free and free to use, without having to worry about CC license issues.
This is TERRIBLE! Besides being able to edit vector images like Will mentioned (which is important for those of us who don't have graphic artists available to create custom images or the budget or time to buy that service ad hoc), you could also search for style "families" (different graphics that were all in the same style). There was a huge range of files and styles in the collection and it was much faster to find what you need than to do a Bing search. Plus, you knew that everything there was free and free to use, without having to worry about CC license issues.
×